Corporations are generally supposed to take money from the working class (consumers) and transfer it to the upper class (stockholders). It's one of the main parts of the reason for corporations existing. Taking money from the government, or any other source, and transferring it to stockholders is also what a corporation is supposed to do, and the more efficiently (profitably), the better. Corporations are amoral entities, by design.
If the stockholders are part of the working class, that's called 'communism'. It's not forbidden, or even necessarily anti-capitalistic, but it's not what corporations are designed to do. Corporations are supposed to take in money with both hands and give back with the Invisible Hand, if at all. Society is supposed to regulate this process, if you're a rationalist, or market forces are purely supposed to, if you're an optimistic social darwinist.
But, anyway, the notion that the government is helping corporations are taking money away from the working class is antithetical to the idea that the government is going all commie socialist. If this guy can explain why health care is somehow more evilly socialist than any other form of federal spending of tax money, then he gets a cookie. I don't expect he deserves a cookie.