Author Topic: News you DID need  (Read 42554 times)

pdrake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,341
  • Karma: +20/-48
Re: News you DID need
« Reply #585 on: April 27, 2017, 12:35:47 AM »
you'd be surprised how much a nutsack can stretch. you have to stretch it yourself, not a woman. they don't do it quite right.

mo

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,531
  • Karma: +135/-55
    • x
Re: News you DID need
« Reply #586 on: April 27, 2017, 05:54:27 AM »
 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: x 10
It's symbolic of our struggle against reality.

random axe

  • Concerned Netizen
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,442
  • Karma: +92/-19
  • Concern Intensifies
Re: News you DID need
« Reply #587 on: April 27, 2017, 08:58:27 AM »
All bluster and no luster.

pdrake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,341
  • Karma: +20/-48
Re: News you DID need
« Reply #588 on: April 27, 2017, 06:52:12 PM »
you'd be surprised how much a nutsack can stretch. you have to stretch it yourself, not a woman. they don't do it quite right.

random axe

  • Concerned Netizen
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,442
  • Karma: +92/-19
  • Concern Intensifies
Re: News you DID need
« Reply #589 on: March 17, 2018, 04:56:31 PM »
Yes, "Libertarians", and why people don't take them seriously:

Libertarian candidate for US Senate proposes giving homeless people shotguns

“Frankly I think the ideal weapon would be a pistol,” he told the Guardian, “but due to the licensing requirements in the state we’re going to have a hard enough time getting homeless people shotguns as it is."

Ellison, a former soldier who has served in Iraq, said he decided to run for office “just to try and make a difference”.

The homeless people would not be forced to carry pump-action shotguns, Ellison said.

“The first thing that we’re gonna do is ask them if they think this is something that would benefit them. We’re certainly not trying to force anything on anybody.”

Ammunition would be provided with the shotguns, probably in five- or six-shell magazines, Ellison said.

More shells would be provided if the owners legitimately used their guns to defend themselves, however, if people spent their ammunition “shooting cans in somebody’s private property” then they would not be given more shells.

Ellison said he did not think the plan was dangerous.


Here in Michigan, I might add.

It's possible (per the article) that he's trying a little incoherently to make a satirical point about the police being excessively armed, but . . . if so, he's not doing a good job.  I've seen three articles about him, and he just sounds like a loon.